Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21191 - 21200 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 21191 - 21200 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Robert F. Karl
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. NO. 97-0889
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12279 - 2017-09-21
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. NO. 97-0889
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12279 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798545 - 2024-05-07
, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798545 - 2024-05-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, his undeveloped argument is contrary to the law and facts in the record, and he fails to address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213615 - 2018-05-31
, his undeveloped argument is contrary to the law and facts in the record, and he fails to address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213615 - 2018-05-31
State v. Dean C. Trepanier
difficulties” and “significant criminal record aside from [OWI-5th].” The court continued: In terms of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26060 - 2006-07-31
difficulties” and “significant criminal record aside from [OWI-5th].” The court continued: In terms of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26060 - 2006-07-31
State v. Gabriel J. Alwin
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10865 - 2005-03-31
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10865 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119691 - 2014-08-17
record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119691 - 2014-08-17
CA Blank Order
, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98531 - 2013-06-23
, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98531 - 2013-06-23
CA Blank Order
of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The petition alleged that Karen is mentally ill and a proper
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95445 - 2013-04-15
of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The petition alleged that Karen is mentally ill and a proper
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95445 - 2013-04-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the appellate record. Absent exceptional circumstances not applicable here, we do not consider “assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120140 - 2014-08-25
of the appellate record. Absent exceptional circumstances not applicable here, we do not consider “assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120140 - 2014-08-25
State v. Luegene Hampton
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9935 - 2005-03-31
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9935 - 2005-03-31