Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21191 - 21200 of 83496 for simple case search.
Search results 21191 - 21200 of 83496 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
extended supervision and reconfinement in a different case constituted a new factor for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047911 - 2025-12-09
extended supervision and reconfinement in a different case constituted a new factor for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047911 - 2025-12-09
[PDF]
State v. Jamerrel Everett
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3444-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14846 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3444-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14846 - 2017-09-21
Kurt F. Froebel v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0844
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12257 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0844
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12257 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kurt F. Froebel v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0844 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12257 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0844 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12257 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Memo in Support of Wisconsin Legislature's Motion to Intervene
Additional Counsel Listed on Following Page FILED 08-22-2023 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0822memo.pdf - 2023-10-16
Additional Counsel Listed on Following Page FILED 08-22-2023 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0822memo.pdf - 2023-10-16
State v. Andrew M. Obriecht
question is do any of you have a problem with that, the way it is set up in a criminal case where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3054 - 2005-03-31
question is do any of you have a problem with that, the way it is set up in a criminal case where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3054 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
2008 WI 70 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP964 Complete Title: Racine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33223 - 2008-06-25
2008 WI 70 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP964 Complete Title: Racine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33223 - 2008-06-25
[PDF]
WI 70
2008 WI 70 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2006AP964 COMPLETE TITLE: Racine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33223 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI 70 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2006AP964 COMPLETE TITLE: Racine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33223 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in this case seeking 581 days of credit. In response to Brown’s pro se motions, the circuit court entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139003 - 2017-09-21
in this case seeking 581 days of credit. In response to Brown’s pro se motions, the circuit court entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139003 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
waive his right to counsel in that prior case. The circuit court agreed. The State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74947 - 2014-09-15
waive his right to counsel in that prior case. The circuit court agreed. The State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74947 - 2014-09-15