Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2121 - 2130 of 63708 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 2121 - 2130 of 63708 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the residence is to be equitably partitioned.” The court determined that “a general Watts joint venture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145492 - 2017-09-21
, the residence is to be equitably partitioned.” The court determined that “a general Watts joint venture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145492 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
partitioned.” The court determined that “a general Watts joint venture cannot be sustained in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145492 - 2015-07-30
partitioned.” The court determined that “a general Watts joint venture cannot be sustained in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145492 - 2015-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
. He remained in custody for 180 days, until the circuit court granted the State’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78232 - 2012-02-21
. He remained in custody for 180 days, until the circuit court granted the State’s motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78232 - 2012-02-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion for sentence credit; (2) an order dated May 2, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27382 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion for sentence credit; (2) an order dated May 2, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27382 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, JOINT-PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. COREY SAFFOLD, JOINT-PETITIONER-RESPONDENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111794 - 2017-09-21
, JOINT-PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. COREY SAFFOLD, JOINT-PETITIONER-RESPONDENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111794 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 31, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
a motion for sentence credit for 330 days, the length of time he spent in custody from the date of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26971 - 2006-10-31
a motion for sentence credit for 330 days, the length of time he spent in custody from the date of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26971 - 2006-10-31
[PDF]
WI APP 167
from a circuit court order denying its motion to compel arbitration of a complaint brought by its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42752 - 2014-09-15
from a circuit court order denying its motion to compel arbitration of a complaint brought by its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42752 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 167
motion to compel arbitration of a complaint brought by its former agents. The former agents allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42752 - 2009-11-23
motion to compel arbitration of a complaint brought by its former agents. The former agents allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42752 - 2009-11-23
[PDF]
WI 30
the motion to suppress, focusing its analysis on the fact that Lonkoski was not in custody when he stated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95267 - 2014-09-15
the motion to suppress, focusing its analysis on the fact that Lonkoski was not in custody when he stated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95267 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
the motion to suppress because Lonkoski was not in custody when he asked for an attorney, and therefore
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95267 - 2013-04-08
the motion to suppress because Lonkoski was not in custody when he asked for an attorney, and therefore
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95267 - 2013-04-08