Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2121 - 2130 of 10291 for ed.

Village of Little Chute v. Todd A. Walitalo
of his precise legal situation. See 3 Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure, § 8.2(c) at 653-52 (3d ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4597 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Response to Congressmen's Motion to File Corrected Proposed Maps (Evers)
JOHNSON, ERIC O’KEEFE, ED PERKINS AND RONALD ZAHN, Petitioners, BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respcorrectmapsevers.pdf - 2022-01-06

[PDF] Motion to Submit Modified Version of Proposed Congressional Map (Congressmen)
No. 2021AP1450-OA In the Supreme Court of Wisconsin BILLIE JOHNSON, ERIC O’KEEFE, ED PERKINS
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/motioncongressmen.pdf - 2022-01-03

[PDF] Motion to File Amicus-Non-Party Brief (Congressmen)
No. 2021AP1450 In the Supreme Court of Wisconsin BILLIE JOHNSON, ERIC O’KEEFE, ED PERKINS
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/motfileamicusnpbriefcongressmen.pdf - 2021-10-18

[PDF] Intervenors’ Nathan Atkinson, Stephen Joseph Wright, Gary Krenz, Sarah J. Hamilton, Jean-Luc Thiffeault, Somesh Jha, Joanne Kane and Leah Dudley Response to Motion to Dismiss
JOHNSON, CHRIS GOEBEL, ED PERKINS, ERIC O'KEEFE, JOE SANFELIPPO, TERRY MOULTON, ROBERT JENSEN, RON ZAHN
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1031intervenorsmotiontodismiss.pdf - 2023-10-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
notice that it “reopen[ed]” the zoning case, and Loberg had not initiated a new case by serving
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632077 - 2023-03-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that Leannais’ memo should be stricken and suggested the circuit court “lack[ed] jurisdiction” to modify his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187281 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
are fully supported by the record. ¶14 First, the prosecutor testified that he “refus[ed]” to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50001 - 2010-05-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
The supreme court has adopted a lodestar methodology, and has “direct[ed] circuit courts to follow its logic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206695 - 2018-01-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(3d ed. 2012); see, e.g., State v. Kitowski, 44 Wis. 2d 259, 261, 170 N.W.2d 703 (1969) (corpus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104498 - 2017-09-21