Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2121 - 2130 of 12426 for mr.
Search results 2121 - 2130 of 12426 for mr.
COURT OF APPEALS
accrual of positive adjustment time: At the time Mr. Saffold was sentenced, there was another early
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86665 - 2012-09-04
accrual of positive adjustment time: At the time Mr. Saffold was sentenced, there was another early
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86665 - 2012-09-04
[PDF]
State v. Mark D. O'Kray
: COURT: Mr. O’Kray, the Court has received a, a Plea Questionnaire and Waiver of Rights Form, from you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12175 - 2017-09-21
: COURT: Mr. O’Kray, the Court has received a, a Plea Questionnaire and Waiver of Rights Form, from you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12175 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Fred J. Kulig v. Trempealeau Electric Cooperative
… contained in the testimony of Mr. [Nile] Beck. Mr. [Thomas] Beane testified, who was not an engineer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15737 - 2017-09-21
… contained in the testimony of Mr. [Nile] Beck. Mr. [Thomas] Beane testified, who was not an engineer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15737 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
say Mr. Sedahl was not at his best behavior, would probably be a way to describe it, a lot of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55087 - 2010-10-04
say Mr. Sedahl was not at his best behavior, would probably be a way to describe it, a lot of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55087 - 2010-10-04
COURT OF APPEALS
of [the] circumstances I’m satisfied that he reviewed the elements of the offense with Mr. Walker” using “appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71556 - 2011-10-03
of [the] circumstances I’m satisfied that he reviewed the elements of the offense with Mr. Walker” using “appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71556 - 2011-10-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[the victim’s] and Mr. Burnette[’s DNA] than if the DNA came from [the victim] and someone who is not related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=829461 - 2024-07-24
[the victim’s] and Mr. Burnette[’s DNA] than if the DNA came from [the victim] and someone who is not related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=829461 - 2024-07-24
Herder Hallmark Consultants, Inc. v. Regnier Consulting Group, Inc.
to his affidavit. The first document reads, in pertinent part: “Mr. Regnier is the President and owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6689 - 2005-03-31
to his affidavit. The first document reads, in pertinent part: “Mr. Regnier is the President and owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6689 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the same thing. But prior to that, and even after, Mr. Hill’s record is a lot worse than my client[’]s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107102 - 2014-01-21
the same thing. But prior to that, and even after, Mr. Hill’s record is a lot worse than my client[’]s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107102 - 2014-01-21
State v. Michael A. Sisk
not allowed for verification. The court stated: [I]f there was something about Mr. Forbes giving his name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3075 - 2005-03-31
not allowed for verification. The court stated: [I]f there was something about Mr. Forbes giving his name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3075 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and developed. First, Mr. Deffke and Mr. Williams gave vague and inconsistent answers about their activities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44583 - 2009-12-14
and developed. First, Mr. Deffke and Mr. Williams gave vague and inconsistent answers about their activities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44583 - 2009-12-14