Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2121 - 2130 of 21451 for warrants.
Search results 2121 - 2130 of 21451 for warrants.
[PDF]
Leonard L. Jones v. State
subsection “may be seized by any officer or [designated] employee,” either with a warrant, under a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13259 - 2017-09-21
subsection “may be seized by any officer or [designated] employee,” either with a warrant, under a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13259 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
resentencing. Hereford contends that the State breached the plea agreement, that a new factor warranted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116159 - 2017-09-21
resentencing. Hereford contends that the State breached the plea agreement, that a new factor warranted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116159 - 2017-09-21
State v. Chai T.
factor is not required before waiver is warranted under § 48.18. In re B.B., 166 Wis.2d 202, 209, 479
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9741 - 2005-03-31
factor is not required before waiver is warranted under § 48.18. In re B.B., 166 Wis.2d 202, 209, 479
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9741 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Daniels
was wanted for two attempted murders so “a third one wouldn't be shit” warranted a mistrial. To obtain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9988 - 2005-03-31
was wanted for two attempted murders so “a third one wouldn't be shit” warranted a mistrial. To obtain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9988 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Johnson
was justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement is subject to this court's de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9964 - 2005-03-31
was justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement is subject to this court's de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9964 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In sum, the application of the PMR law is not a new sentencing factor warranting sentence modification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=299264 - 2020-10-27
. In sum, the application of the PMR law is not a new sentencing factor warranting sentence modification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=299264 - 2020-10-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” [Terry, 392 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27127 - 2014-09-15
together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” [Terry, 392 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27127 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
those facts warrant suppression. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53317 - 2014-09-15
those facts warrant suppression. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53317 - 2014-09-15
Robert W. Probst v. Peter Chen
the contract warranted the scanner was made in 1999 and that the tube was not more than eight months old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6851 - 2005-03-31
the contract warranted the scanner was made in 1999 and that the tube was not more than eight months old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6851 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathon R. Torres
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6102 - 2005-03-31
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6102 - 2005-03-31