Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2121 - 2130 of 6433 for wide.

COURT OF APPEALS
to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. “A trial court has wide discretion to order a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132048 - 2014-12-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶35. To make that determination, the circuit court should “‘consider a wide range of factors.’” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance. Id. at 690. Deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88087 - 2012-10-10

[PDF] NOTICE
performance by showing that counsel’s performance fell “outside the wide range of professionally competent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57112 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a wide range of other factors relating to the defendant, the offense, and the community. See id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227221 - 2018-11-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
or omissions that were “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Strickland, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189890 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. § 806.07(1)(h), the circuit court must also “‘consider a wide range of factors’ in determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1099954 - 2026-04-08

[PDF] State v. William Avery
, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions of counsel that were “outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16020 - 2017-09-21

State v. Todd A. Murdock
. App. 1995) (Although the State is given wide latitude in closing argument, “[t]he line between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15043 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joseph Keepers
specific acts or omissions of counsel, which were “outside the wide range of professionally competent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2284 - 2005-03-31