Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21201 - 21210 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 21201 - 21210 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Drazen Markovic
. He claims the trial court erred: (1) because his postconviction attorney should have raised a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18341 - 2005-05-31
. He claims the trial court erred: (1) because his postconviction attorney should have raised a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18341 - 2005-05-31
[PDF]
Charles A. Ghidorzi v. Steven J. Pergande
“An ‘accord and satisfaction’ is an agreement to discharge an existing disputed claim; it constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18816 - 2017-09-21
“An ‘accord and satisfaction’ is an agreement to discharge an existing disputed claim; it constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18816 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 49
Shannon’s claim. ¶2 Northwest argues the circuit court violated WIS. STAT. § 803.08(11) (2019-20),1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372785 - 2021-08-19
Shannon’s claim. ¶2 Northwest argues the circuit court violated WIS. STAT. § 803.08(11) (2019-20),1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372785 - 2021-08-19
[PDF]
State v. Kelly J. Bodoh
. He requests a new trial in the interests of justice. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2982 - 2017-09-19
. He requests a new trial in the interests of justice. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2982 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Dennis Demarce v. Francis E. Diesing
134.07 is inappropriate if the DeMarces were unable to prevail on the underlying claim. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14591 - 2017-09-21
134.07 is inappropriate if the DeMarces were unable to prevail on the underlying claim. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14591 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
liability for any claims asserted against Penske by Frank and Nicole Ritter based on the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90106 - 2012-12-05
liability for any claims asserted against Penske by Frank and Nicole Ritter based on the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90106 - 2012-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
by examining the claim that Mason should be permitted to withdraw his no-contest plea because the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100406 - 2013-08-05
by examining the claim that Mason should be permitted to withdraw his no-contest plea because the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100406 - 2013-08-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The circuit court determined that the Logans failed to provide written notice of their claims of breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134849 - 2017-09-21
The circuit court determined that the Logans failed to provide written notice of their claims of breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134849 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John L. Jones
conduct, which, he claims, was a mitigating factor. He also argues that the court denied him due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6534 - 2017-09-19
conduct, which, he claims, was a mitigating factor. He also argues that the court denied him due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6534 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 119
whether the residents’ action is barred for failure to give the Town notice of their claim under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37172 - 2014-09-15
whether the residents’ action is barred for failure to give the Town notice of their claim under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37172 - 2014-09-15