Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21201 - 21210 of 68517 for did.
Search results 21201 - 21210 of 68517 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
, 576 N.W.2d at 87. ¶4 Jaimes contends that he did not previously raise his speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70924 - 2011-09-19
, 576 N.W.2d at 87. ¶4 Jaimes contends that he did not previously raise his speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70924 - 2011-09-19
State v. Gregory Walker
, Walker filed his postconviction motion, alleging that: (1) he did not understand that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13299 - 2005-03-31
, Walker filed his postconviction motion, alleging that: (1) he did not understand that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13299 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to others—although the circuit court did not refer to this standard in its oral decision or check
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963012 - 2025-05-30
to others—although the circuit court did not refer to this standard in its oral decision or check
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963012 - 2025-05-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argument. Generally speaking, Ganta appears to complain that he did not receive a fair trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75596 - 2014-09-15
argument. Generally speaking, Ganta appears to complain that he did not receive a fair trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75596 - 2014-09-15
State v. Delmar McNeal
that the trial court did not clearly err, and therefore affirm. In August 1993, McNeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9385 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court did not clearly err, and therefore affirm. In August 1993, McNeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9385 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Audrey Ann (Bricko) Yenter v. Andrew Kenneth Bricko
did not establish a substantial change in circumstances. At the time Bricko agreed to pay $439, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9026 - 2017-09-19
did not establish a substantial change in circumstances. At the time Bricko agreed to pay $439, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9026 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James E. Jones
. App. 1989). He did not do so. He did bring a postconviction motion to vacate his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11205 - 2017-09-19
. App. 1989). He did not do so. He did bring a postconviction motion to vacate his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11205 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robin K. Trapp v. Mark A. Trapp
$450 monthly maintenance.1 He argues that he did not willfully disregard the maintenance order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12346 - 2017-09-21
$450 monthly maintenance.1 He argues that he did not willfully disregard the maintenance order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12346 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI 23
). Not Participating: WILCOX, J., did not participate. Attorneys: 2007 WI 23 notice This opinion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28193 - 2007-02-20
). Not Participating: WILCOX, J., did not participate. Attorneys: 2007 WI 23 notice This opinion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28193 - 2007-02-20
John C. Koshick v. State
that dismissal with prejudice was being sought, because the defendants’ motion to dismiss on the merits did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3241 - 2005-03-31
that dismissal with prejudice was being sought, because the defendants’ motion to dismiss on the merits did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3241 - 2005-03-31