Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21201 - 21210 of 58499 for speedy trial.
Search results 21201 - 21210 of 58499 for speedy trial.
State v. Nathan Liszewski
by not appealing the juvenile court’s decision to waive him into adult court. The trial court found, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11294 - 2005-03-31
by not appealing the juvenile court’s decision to waive him into adult court. The trial court found, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11294 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as the real party in interest. ¶4 At trial, UMB produced a copy of the note, this one endorsed in blank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207121 - 2018-02-08
as the real party in interest. ¶4 At trial, UMB produced a copy of the note, this one endorsed in blank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207121 - 2018-02-08
COURT OF APPEALS
in permitting him to proceed pro se, there was insufficient evidence presented at trial, and a limiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59567 - 2011-01-31
in permitting him to proceed pro se, there was insufficient evidence presented at trial, and a limiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59567 - 2011-01-31
State v. Robert E. Tucker
)(a) and 939.05 (1999–2000).[1] He argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4730 - 2005-03-31
)(a) and 939.05 (1999–2000).[1] He argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4730 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Janella R.
an expert witness. Janella also contends that she is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6952 - 2017-09-20
an expert witness. Janella also contends that she is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6952 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Janella R.
an expert witness. Janella also contends that she is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6953 - 2017-09-20
an expert witness. Janella also contends that she is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6953 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Betty L. Runchey-Wolff v. William A. Wolff
challenges the unequal property division in William’s favor. Because the trial court did not articulate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15268 - 2017-09-21
challenges the unequal property division in William’s favor. Because the trial court did not articulate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15268 - 2017-09-21
2008 WI APP 10
for postconviction relief. He argues he is entitled to a new trial on the two burglary charges because the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31271 - 2008-02-27
for postconviction relief. He argues he is entitled to a new trial on the two burglary charges because the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31271 - 2008-02-27
[PDF]
WI APP 10
for postconviction relief. He argues he is entitled to a new trial on the two burglary charges because the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31271 - 2014-09-15
for postconviction relief. He argues he is entitled to a new trial on the two burglary charges because the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31271 - 2014-09-15
Citizens' Utility Board (CUB) v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
requirements and deeming it untimely. We agree with the trial court’s conclusion and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5457 - 2005-03-31
requirements and deeming it untimely. We agree with the trial court’s conclusion and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5457 - 2005-03-31