Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21211 - 21220 of 59320 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 21211 - 21220 of 59320 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s summary judgment order dismissing Wallskog’s breach of contract claim against East-West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44424 - 2009-12-14
court’s summary judgment order dismissing Wallskog’s breach of contract claim against East-West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44424 - 2009-12-14
[PDF]
Frontsheet
(collectively, "Mr. Alderman") claiming he was negligent because he procured a policy that did not conform
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261731 - 2020-07-14
(collectively, "Mr. Alderman") claiming he was negligent because he procured a policy that did not conform
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261731 - 2020-07-14
[PDF]
Althea M. Keup v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services
provider. The Division concluded that it did not have jurisdiction to hear Keup's claim and dismissed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16594 - 2017-09-21
provider. The Division concluded that it did not have jurisdiction to hear Keup's claim and dismissed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16594 - 2017-09-21
State v. Warren A. Moffett
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Moffett claims that he is entitled to an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4321 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Moffett claims that he is entitled to an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4321 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
at a new trial in this matter.” In support of the claim, counsel stated that, “upon information and belief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74595 - 2011-12-05
at a new trial in this matter.” In support of the claim, counsel stated that, “upon information and belief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74595 - 2011-12-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stayed. No. 2024AP2172-CR 4 ¶6 Before Cotter was sentenced, Sarah filed a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054224 - 2025-12-23
stayed. No. 2024AP2172-CR 4 ¶6 Before Cotter was sentenced, Sarah filed a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054224 - 2025-12-23
Dennis Demarce v. Francis E. Diesing
on the underlying claim. We disagree with Diesing's legal argument. Nonetheless, because the verdict was fatally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14591 - 2005-03-31
on the underlying claim. We disagree with Diesing's legal argument. Nonetheless, because the verdict was fatally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14591 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 49
Shannon’s claim. ¶2 Northwest argues the circuit court violated WIS. STAT. § 803.08(11) (2019-20),1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372785 - 2021-08-19
Shannon’s claim. ¶2 Northwest argues the circuit court violated WIS. STAT. § 803.08(11) (2019-20),1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372785 - 2021-08-19
[PDF]
Dennis Demarce v. Francis E. Diesing
134.07 is inappropriate if the DeMarces were unable to prevail on the underlying claim. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14591 - 2017-09-21
134.07 is inappropriate if the DeMarces were unable to prevail on the underlying claim. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14591 - 2017-09-21
State v. James M. Moran
. Moran claims he was prejudiced because he did not prepare to defend the additional charges. An amended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10902 - 2005-03-31
. Moran claims he was prejudiced because he did not prepare to defend the additional charges. An amended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10902 - 2005-03-31