Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21211 - 21220 of 63981 for records/1000.

State v. Michael A. Myers
that the record on appeal does not establish that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3310 - 2005-03-31

State v. David A. H.
N.W.2d 30 (1998). A court properly exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3558 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that these cases are appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709581 - 2023-10-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
2 consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869354 - 2024-10-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
2 consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869354 - 2024-10-30

COURT OF APPEALS
of record in light of the applicable law to reach a reasoned decision. See Hartung v. Hartung, 102 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105006 - 2013-12-02

CA Blank Order
.” In the supplemental no-merit report, Obernberger says that, although he found no testimony in the record that U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122951 - 2014-09-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
right to respond and has failed to respond. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240394 - 2019-05-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are unable to determine the correct amount owed from the record before this court, we vacate the December
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111136 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Edward C. Brandau
and that Brandau was not prejudiced by their failure to raise the speedy trial issue because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10139 - 2017-09-19