Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21211 - 21220 of 64013 for records/1000.
Search results 21211 - 21220 of 64013 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=930446 - 2025-03-20
and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=930446 - 2025-03-20
State v. Clarice McGee
time, the circuit court noted that McGee had a substantial prior record of criminal activity—including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21086 - 2006-01-30
time, the circuit court noted that McGee had a substantial prior record of criminal activity—including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21086 - 2006-01-30
Pearl A. Powers v. Thomas F. Powers
affairs. The deed was never recorded. A valid gift depends on four elements: (1) intent to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11947 - 2005-03-31
affairs. The deed was never recorded. A valid gift depends on four elements: (1) intent to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11947 - 2005-03-31
James Dailey v. Rita Dailey
that the court which entered the initial order intended to equalize the award of income.[1] The record, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6119 - 2005-03-31
that the court which entered the initial order intended to equalize the award of income.[1] The record, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6119 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mai Lee Vue
. Vue has not done so. This court has conducted the independent review of the record that is required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8798 - 2005-03-31
. Vue has not done so. This court has conducted the independent review of the record that is required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8798 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
As the Board correctly points out, the appellate record does not include any document establishing that Slocum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88200 - 2012-10-15
As the Board correctly points out, the appellate record does not include any document establishing that Slocum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88200 - 2012-10-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. Ross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. Ross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
State v. Edward C. Brandau
the speedy trial issue because the record conclusively shows that Brandau's speedy trial rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10139 - 2005-03-31
the speedy trial issue because the record conclusively shows that Brandau's speedy trial rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10139 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in one of the cases. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, Nos. 2020AP1783-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=428752 - 2021-09-21
in one of the cases. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, Nos. 2020AP1783-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=428752 - 2021-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615610 - 2023-02-01
review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615610 - 2023-02-01