Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21211 - 21220 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 21211 - 21220 of 58547 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Barbara Doyle v. Ronald A. Arthur
in this case. The Dodge County action was eventually dismissed, and the trial court entered its order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13276 - 2017-09-21
in this case. The Dodge County action was eventually dismissed, and the trial court entered its order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13276 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert E. Tucker
)(a) and 939.05 (1999–2000).[1] He argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4730 - 2005-03-31
)(a) and 939.05 (1999–2000).[1] He argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4730 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court denying his motion for a new trial. Maher requests that we exercise our discretionary authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64852 - 2014-09-15
court denying his motion for a new trial. Maher requests that we exercise our discretionary authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64852 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Janella R.
an expert witness. Janella also contends that she is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6953 - 2017-09-20
an expert witness. Janella also contends that she is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6953 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102261 - 2017-09-21
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102261 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in permitting him to proceed pro se, there was insufficient evidence presented at trial, and a limiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59567 - 2011-01-31
in permitting him to proceed pro se, there was insufficient evidence presented at trial, and a limiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59567 - 2011-01-31
[PDF]
Betty L. Runchey-Wolff v. William A. Wolff
challenges the unequal property division in William’s favor. Because the trial court did not articulate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15268 - 2017-09-21
challenges the unequal property division in William’s favor. Because the trial court did not articulate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15268 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Janella R.
an expert witness. Janella also contends that she is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6950 - 2017-09-20
an expert witness. Janella also contends that she is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6950 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Charles Eggenberger appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102261 - 2013-09-23
PER CURIAM. Charles Eggenberger appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102261 - 2013-09-23
[PDF]
State v. Robert E. Tucker
. §§ 940.01(1)(a) and 939.05 No. 01-3444-CR 2 (1999–2000). 1 He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4730 - 2017-09-19
. §§ 940.01(1)(a) and 939.05 No. 01-3444-CR 2 (1999–2000). 1 He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4730 - 2017-09-19