Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21221 - 21230 of 64786 for b's.
Search results 21221 - 21230 of 64786 for b's.
[PDF]
State v. Michael F. Howard
6 B. Double Jeopardy ¶10 Howard also argues that his convictions for recklessly endangering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5394 - 2017-09-19
6 B. Double Jeopardy ¶10 Howard also argues that his convictions for recklessly endangering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5394 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is not subject to property division. That paragraph excludes from division any property acquired “[b]y reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82942 - 2014-09-15
is not subject to property division. That paragraph excludes from division any property acquired “[b]y reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82942 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The 2 WISCONSIN STAT. § 346.34(1)(b) provides in relevant part that “[i]n the event any other traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80080 - 2014-09-15
. The 2 WISCONSIN STAT. § 346.34(1)(b) provides in relevant part that “[i]n the event any other traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80080 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
), and 939.62(1)(b) (2007-08).[1] The circuit court imposed a five-year sentence, bifurcated as three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58253 - 2010-12-27
), and 939.62(1)(b) (2007-08).[1] The circuit court imposed a five-year sentence, bifurcated as three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58253 - 2010-12-27
[PDF]
State v. John W. Moore
a disturbance is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor. The statute thus creates two elements for disorderly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11607 - 2017-09-19
a disturbance is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor. The statute thus creates two elements for disorderly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11607 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from judgments of the circuit court for Portage County: THOMAS B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102328 - 2017-09-21
, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from judgments of the circuit court for Portage County: THOMAS B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102328 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supreme court stated that “[b]ecause these statements mirrored the statutory standard, they met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927060 - 2025-03-19
supreme court stated that “[b]ecause these statements mirrored the statutory standard, they met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927060 - 2025-03-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2009- 2010). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66409 - 2014-09-15
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) (2009- 2010). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66409 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Fond du Lac County v. Elizabeth M.P.
(10)(e), STATS., “[b]y implication … extended the competency of the court to hear the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12270 - 2014-09-15
(10)(e), STATS., “[b]y implication … extended the competency of the court to hear the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12270 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Margaret Lamkin v. St. Croix County
the requisite notice has not been prejudicial ...." Section 893.80(1)(b), STATS., contains a second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10088 - 2017-09-19
the requisite notice has not been prejudicial ...." Section 893.80(1)(b), STATS., contains a second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10088 - 2017-09-19