Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21221 - 21230 of 82673 for case codes/1000.
Search results 21221 - 21230 of 82673 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
WI 33
2012 WI 33 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2006AP2851-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80298 - 2014-09-15
2012 WI 33 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2006AP2851-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80298 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 34
2023 WI App 34 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2021AP2028
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666051 - 2023-09-28
2023 WI App 34 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2021AP2028
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666051 - 2023-09-28
William O. Marquis v. St. Mary's Hospital of Milwaukee
of counsel and I excepted [sic] responsibility for the case with the understanding that he would attempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10696 - 2005-03-31
of counsel and I excepted [sic] responsibility for the case with the understanding that he would attempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10696 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claims the Heberts failed to establish a prima facie case for summary judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131444 - 2017-09-21
claims the Heberts failed to establish a prima facie case for summary judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131444 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, we affirm. BACKGROUND ΒΆ2 The underlying dispute in this case dates back to 2003, when John G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871872 - 2024-11-05
, we affirm. BACKGROUND ΒΆ2 The underlying dispute in this case dates back to 2003, when John G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871872 - 2024-11-05
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 24, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appe...
that the evidence was insufficient in both cases to warrant the issuance of an injunction. Finally, he asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33496 - 2008-07-23
that the evidence was insufficient in both cases to warrant the issuance of an injunction. Finally, he asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33496 - 2008-07-23
State v. James A. Montgomery
in the case. However, once again, no copy of an actual judgment of conviction was filed by postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12979 - 2005-03-31
in the case. However, once again, no copy of an actual judgment of conviction was filed by postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12979 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian D. Seefeldt
2003 WI 47 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 01-1969-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16530 - 2017-09-21
2003 WI 47 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 01-1969-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16530 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 87
2013 WI App 87 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP1691-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97983 - 2017-09-21
2013 WI App 87 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP1691-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97983 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
was insufficient in both cases to warrant the issuance of an injunction. Finally, he asserts that, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33496 - 2014-09-15
was insufficient in both cases to warrant the issuance of an injunction. Finally, he asserts that, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33496 - 2014-09-15