Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21221 - 21230 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21221 - 21230 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. First, we determine de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098400 - 2026-03-31
v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. First, we determine de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098400 - 2026-03-31
Norvin Lewis v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin
, our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14951 - 2005-03-31
, our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14951 - 2005-03-31
Donald Wollheim v. University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation, Inc.
the Foundation on summary judgment. We perform summary judgment analysis de novo, applying the same method
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19405 - 2005-08-24
the Foundation on summary judgment. We perform summary judgment analysis de novo, applying the same method
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19405 - 2005-08-24
Jeffrey Opichka v. Racine County
. The deputies appeal. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24711 - 2006-05-30
. The deputies appeal. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24711 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
State v. Anthony S.
review de novo. See State v. Dawn M., 189 Wis.2d 480, 484, 526 N.W.2d 275, 276 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15546 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See State v. Dawn M., 189 Wis.2d 480, 484, 526 N.W.2d 275, 276 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15546 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Diane Haddican-Czestler v. Mitchell J. Barrock
questions of law de novo. See State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis.2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764 (Ct. App.1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13587 - 2017-09-21
questions of law de novo. See State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis.2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764 (Ct. App.1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13587 - 2017-09-21
Nor-Lake, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.
the interpretation of an insurance contract, a question of law that this court determines de novo. See Hull v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15645 - 2005-03-31
the interpretation of an insurance contract, a question of law that this court determines de novo. See Hull v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15645 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rule Construction, Ltd. v. Nicholas Ladopoulos
, 228, 424 N.W.2d 159, 161 (1988). Our review is de novo. We first examine the amended complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11909 - 2017-09-21
, 228, 424 N.W.2d 159, 161 (1988). Our review is de novo. We first examine the amended complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11909 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The trial court’s initial decision to join charges for trial is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258473 - 2020-04-28
. The trial court’s initial decision to join charges for trial is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258473 - 2020-04-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a prosecutor’s sentencing remarks breached the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=419814 - 2021-09-02
a prosecutor’s sentencing remarks breached the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=419814 - 2021-09-02