Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21221 - 21230 of 29838 for des.
Search results 21221 - 21230 of 29838 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
are not convinced. ¶23 Whether charges are multiplicitous is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57466 - 2010-12-06
are not convinced. ¶23 Whether charges are multiplicitous is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57466 - 2010-12-06
Associated/F&M Bank v. Ray A. Johnson
for summary judgment. We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3864 - 2005-03-31
for summary judgment. We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3864 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
breach of the plea agreement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57475 - 2010-12-07
breach of the plea agreement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57475 - 2010-12-07
COURT OF APPEALS
solely at a question of law. We review questions of law de novo. United Rentals, Inc. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63999 - 2011-05-11
solely at a question of law. We review questions of law de novo. United Rentals, Inc. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63999 - 2011-05-11
State v. Mark A. Walters
of constitutional fact we review de novo. State v. Cummings, 199 Wis.2d 721, 748, 546 N.W.2d 406, 416 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14727 - 2005-03-31
of constitutional fact we review de novo. State v. Cummings, 199 Wis.2d 721, 748, 546 N.W.2d 406, 416 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14727 - 2005-03-31
2011 WI APP 33
judgment de novo using the same standard and methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59802 - 2011-03-29
judgment de novo using the same standard and methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59802 - 2011-03-29
[PDF]
Roger D. H. v. Virginia O.
discretion because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue de novo. F.R., 225 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3368 - 2017-09-19
discretion because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue de novo. F.R., 225 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3368 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
The Estate of Martha Burgess v. Carl Peterson
interpretation, which presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10853 - 2017-09-20
interpretation, which presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10853 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Kirk L. Griese
case is a question of law which we decide de novo. Id. at 680. 3 We concluded in Wille
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7055 - 2017-09-20
case is a question of law which we decide de novo. Id. at 680. 3 We concluded in Wille
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7055 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the admission of evidence violates a defendant’s right to confrontation is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597189 - 2022-12-06
the admission of evidence violates a defendant’s right to confrontation is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597189 - 2022-12-06