Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21221 - 21230 of 59436 for quit claim deed.
Search results 21221 - 21230 of 59436 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
R.M. Iverson v. City of River Falls
his claim of excessive property tax assessment. He argues (1) the trial court erroneously denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8997 - 2017-09-19
his claim of excessive property tax assessment. He argues (1) the trial court erroneously denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8997 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Rodosvaldo C. Pozo
offense was legally insufficient. Pozo claims that the information omitted three essential elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4831 - 2017-09-19
offense was legally insufficient. Pozo claims that the information omitted three essential elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4831 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James M. Smith
Agreement on Detainers, § 976.05, STATS. We reject both claims and affirm the judgment and the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8273 - 2017-09-19
Agreement on Detainers, § 976.05, STATS. We reject both claims and affirm the judgment and the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8273 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Edward J. Heuer
affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 When a defendant claims that his or her plea agreement was breached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7275 - 2017-09-20
affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 When a defendant claims that his or her plea agreement was breached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7275 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there would be arguable merit to a claim that Lefler’s guilty plea was not knowingly, intelligently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685291 - 2023-07-28
there would be arguable merit to a claim that Lefler’s guilty plea was not knowingly, intelligently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685291 - 2023-07-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for not retaining an expert. Additionally, we explain why Wilson cannot claim that his trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252235 - 2020-01-07
for not retaining an expert. Additionally, we explain why Wilson cannot claim that his trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252235 - 2020-01-07
[PDF]
State v. Charles Jones
relief. He claims that he was deprived of his right to confrontation when the trial court No. 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3374 - 2017-09-19
relief. He claims that he was deprived of his right to confrontation when the trial court No. 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3374 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
witnesses to assert their Fifth Amendment privilege not to testify. ¶4 To understand these claims, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234444 - 2019-02-12
witnesses to assert their Fifth Amendment privilege not to testify. ¶4 To understand these claims, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234444 - 2019-02-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Therefore, there is no arguable merit to Meier’s claims that the amended complaint circumvented his right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=553213 - 2022-08-09
. Therefore, there is no arguable merit to Meier’s claims that the amended complaint circumvented his right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=553213 - 2022-08-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. See State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶18 & n.11, 294
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219129 - 2018-09-19
, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. See State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶18 & n.11, 294
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219129 - 2018-09-19