Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21221 - 21230 of 64056 for records/1000.
Search results 21221 - 21230 of 64056 for records/1000.
[PDF]
Garry A. Borzych v. Daniel Bertrand
should be vacated because the record did not support the increased penalty. The court relied on State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20742 - 2017-09-21
should be vacated because the record did not support the increased penalty. The court relied on State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20742 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Parent
809.32(1)(d), which requires his attorney to serve him with a copy of the record. By previous order
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24865 - 2017-09-21
809.32(1)(d), which requires his attorney to serve him with a copy of the record. By previous order
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24865 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
No. 2015CV443. Based upon our review of the record, we conclude at conference that the court properly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240590 - 2019-05-15
No. 2015CV443. Based upon our review of the record, we conclude at conference that the court properly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240590 - 2019-05-15
CA Blank Order
, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105252 - 2013-12-03
, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105252 - 2013-12-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the grounds of prosecutorial misconduct and judicial bias. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752325 - 2024-01-24
on the grounds of prosecutorial misconduct and judicial bias. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752325 - 2024-01-24
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Holmes
. This court has independently reviewed No. 95-3253-CR-NM -2- the record, and considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10009 - 2017-09-19
. This court has independently reviewed No. 95-3253-CR-NM -2- the record, and considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10009 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205968 - 2017-12-27
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205968 - 2017-12-27
State v. Robert T. Langston
.[1] Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11319 - 2005-03-31
.[1] Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11319 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference No. 2018AP2179-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258238 - 2020-04-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference No. 2018AP2179-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258238 - 2020-04-21
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), no issues of arguable merit appear
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147090 - 2015-08-20
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), no issues of arguable merit appear
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147090 - 2015-08-20