Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21231 - 21240 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21231 - 21240 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Richard E. Davis
—which Davis claims was readily available to counsel under the open records law—was de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14557 - 2017-09-21
—which Davis claims was readily available to counsel under the open records law—was de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14557 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
additional facts as needed below. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34251 - 2014-09-15
additional facts as needed below. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34251 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. State v. Bobby G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95354 - 2013-04-10
a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. State v. Bobby G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95354 - 2013-04-10
[PDF]
State v. Montgomery P. Avant
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo,” State v. Bentley, 201 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6224 - 2017-09-19
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo,” State v. Bentley, 201 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6224 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, which this court decides de novo. Id. at 634. ¶6 Sentence determinations are accorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32392 - 2008-04-09
, which this court decides de novo. Id. at 634. ¶6 Sentence determinations are accorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32392 - 2008-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. Reviewing courts should be “highly deferential” to counsel’s strategic decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199399 - 2017-10-31
review de novo. Id. Reviewing courts should be “highly deferential” to counsel’s strategic decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199399 - 2017-10-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, which we also review de novo. Tesker, 208 Wis. 2d at 605. Ordinance No. 785
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161306 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law, which we also review de novo. Tesker, 208 Wis. 2d at 605. Ordinance No. 785
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161306 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law,” which we review de novo. State v. Moua, 215 Wis. 2d 511, 517, 573 N.W.2d 202 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163997 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law,” which we review de novo. State v. Moua, 215 Wis. 2d 511, 517, 573 N.W.2d 202 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163997 - 2017-09-21
2010 WI APP 14
on the municipal citations amounted to an admission by Williams, is a question we review de novo. See Kraus, 261
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44822 - 2010-01-26
on the municipal citations amounted to an admission by Williams, is a question we review de novo. See Kraus, 261
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44822 - 2010-01-26
State v. Thomas H. Highman
of law, which we review de novo, although we uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3736 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we review de novo, although we uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3736 - 2005-03-31