Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21241 - 21250 of 69160 for as he.
Search results 21241 - 21250 of 69160 for as he.
Leslie J. Schatz v. Gary R. McCaughtry
intoxication. At the first hearing on the conduct report, Schatz did not testify, but he did submit a written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3364 - 2005-03-31
intoxication. At the first hearing on the conduct report, Schatz did not testify, but he did submit a written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3364 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James J. Bartow
, fourth offense, contrary to §§ 346.63(1)(a) and 346.65(2)(d), STATS. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14097 - 2014-09-15
, fourth offense, contrary to §§ 346.63(1)(a) and 346.65(2)(d), STATS. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14097 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(“THC”). In his response to the no-merit report, Buntrock argued that he was denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699160 - 2023-09-06
(“THC”). In his response to the no-merit report, Buntrock argued that he was denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699160 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(“THC”). In his response to the no-merit report, Buntrock argued that he was denied the effective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699160 - 2023-09-06
(“THC”). In his response to the no-merit report, Buntrock argued that he was denied the effective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699160 - 2023-09-06
State v. Randolph S. Bauernfeind
-94. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11554 - 2005-03-31
-94. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11554 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Gerald J. Vanderhoef appeals from a reconfinement order. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68388 - 2014-09-15
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Gerald J. Vanderhoef appeals from a reconfinement order. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68388 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was sent a copy of the no-merit report, and he filed a response. Upon review of the record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910644 - 2025-02-06
was sent a copy of the no-merit report, and he filed a response. Upon review of the record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910644 - 2025-02-06
[PDF]
State v. Matthew S. Olsen
unless otherwise noted. No. 2005AP2642-CR 2 to make a prima facie showing that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25922 - 2017-09-21
unless otherwise noted. No. 2005AP2642-CR 2 to make a prima facie showing that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25922 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was sent a copy of the no-merit report, and he filed a response. Upon review of the record, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910644 - 2025-02-06
was sent a copy of the no-merit report, and he filed a response. Upon review of the record, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910644 - 2025-02-06
State v. Norbert J. Maday
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8774 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8774 - 2005-03-31