Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21241 - 21250 of 34000 for dismissal.
Search results 21241 - 21250 of 34000 for dismissal.
State v. Justin H.
in and dismissed. The issue at disposition was placement. The State argued that Justin had been placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9426 - 2005-03-31
in and dismissed. The issue at disposition was placement. The State argued that Justin had been placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9426 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
imprisonment was dismissed and read in at sentencing. The circuit court accepted Jackson’s plea and imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927357 - 2025-03-18
imprisonment was dismissed and read in at sentencing. The circuit court accepted Jackson’s plea and imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927357 - 2025-03-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
were dismissed and read-in, and all the repeater allegations were dropped. The court sentenced Clark
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101125 - 2017-09-21
were dismissed and read-in, and all the repeater allegations were dropped. The court sentenced Clark
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101125 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Patel testified that Donna had lobbied for lower doses of medication and had “off and on” dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99952 - 2013-07-30
. Patel testified that Donna had lobbied for lower doses of medication and had “off and on” dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99952 - 2013-07-30
State v. Justin H.
in and dismissed. The issue at disposition was placement. The State argued that Justin had been placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9427 - 2005-03-31
in and dismissed. The issue at disposition was placement. The State argued that Justin had been placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9427 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
). The defendants argue that the “Draconian” sanction of dismissal is not justified by “a party’s simple negligence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98200 - 2013-06-18
). The defendants argue that the “Draconian” sanction of dismissal is not justified by “a party’s simple negligence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98200 - 2013-06-18
State v. Robert W. Miller
dismissing his request for Huber law privileges, the court did not exercise any discretion because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2410 - 2005-03-31
dismissing his request for Huber law privileges, the court did not exercise any discretion because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2410 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert W. Miller
dismissing his request for Huber law privileges, the court did not exercise any discretion because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2409 - 2005-03-31
dismissing his request for Huber law privileges, the court did not exercise any discretion because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2409 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Boucher, appeal a summary judgment dismissing their underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96374 - 2014-09-15
Boucher, appeal a summary judgment dismissing their underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96374 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and possessing a firearm as an adjudicated delinquent. The remaining charges were dismissed and read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523326 - 2022-05-24
and possessing a firearm as an adjudicated delinquent. The remaining charges were dismissed and read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523326 - 2022-05-24