Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21241 - 21250 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 21241 - 21250 of 64042 for records/1000.
State v. Edward C. Brandau
the speedy trial issue because the record conclusively shows that Brandau's speedy trial rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10140 - 2005-03-31
the speedy trial issue because the record conclusively shows that Brandau's speedy trial rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10140 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the Record, we conclude there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues. Therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98640 - 2013-06-24
an independent review of the Record, we conclude there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues. Therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98640 - 2013-06-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). J.L. has not responded. After reviewing the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918447 - 2025-02-26
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). J.L. has not responded. After reviewing the Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918447 - 2025-02-26
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102475 - 2013-09-25
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102475 - 2013-09-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718182 - 2023-10-24
court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718182 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
State v. Eugene Henry Jensen
by the prosecution. We reject Jensen’s claims for two reasons. First, our review of the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6323 - 2017-09-19
by the prosecution. We reject Jensen’s claims for two reasons. First, our review of the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6323 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2022AP512-CRNM 2 record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699548 - 2023-09-06
. No. 2022AP512-CRNM 2 record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699548 - 2023-09-06
James Dailey v. Rita Dailey
that the court which entered the initial order intended to equalize the award of income.[1] The record, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6119 - 2005-03-31
that the court which entered the initial order intended to equalize the award of income.[1] The record, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6119 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144401 - 2017-09-21
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144401 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. Ross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. Ross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14