Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21251 - 21260 of 98582 for civil court case status online.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of Leister’s “approach” to other cases in the Sauk County circuit court, that Leister had knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291051 - 2020-09-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
waived his right to a jury trial, the case was tried to the court. At trial, it was undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260762 - 2020-05-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the case had been litigated. The court explained that it had been left to the court to “do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142512 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that a sentencing court does not need to consider the victim’s rehabilitative needs in every case, as it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204609 - 2017-12-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 14, 2023 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631423 - 2023-03-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sentence. Because we conclude that the circuit court in this case properly exercised its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122465 - 2014-09-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 25, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108271 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with [Zeb].” The court then reasoned, “I do think being the case worker [Lungstrom] … should and she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702473 - 2023-09-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 3, 2026 Samuel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072093 - 2026-02-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 23, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132026 - 2017-09-21