Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21271 - 21280 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21271 - 21280 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
NOTICE
] review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61921 - 2014-09-15
] review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61921 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 97
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” Id. The Fourth Amendment protects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36947 - 2014-09-15
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” Id. The Fourth Amendment protects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36947 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Steven C. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.
for failure to state a claim is a question of law reviewed by this court de novo; this court “accepts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5170 - 2017-09-19
for failure to state a claim is a question of law reviewed by this court de novo; this court “accepts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5170 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673196 - 2023-06-27
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673196 - 2023-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. Id., ¶19. However, we will uphold the circuit court’s factual findings unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80829 - 2014-09-15
that we review de novo. Id., ¶19. However, we will uphold the circuit court’s factual findings unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80829 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gabriel L. Ortiz
statute, WIS. STAT. § 973.20. We review this question de novo without deference to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3391 - 2017-09-19
statute, WIS. STAT. § 973.20. We review this question de novo without deference to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3391 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Kathrine I. Barber v. Anne Schmitz Arnesen
evidence sufficiency de novo. Seraphine v. Hardiman, 44 Wis. 2d 60, 65, 170 N.W.2d 739 (1969). We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5978 - 2017-09-19
evidence sufficiency de novo. Seraphine v. Hardiman, 44 Wis. 2d 60, 65, 170 N.W.2d 739 (1969). We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5978 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Colin C. Morse
. 1993). This is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Second, if the initial joinder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12405 - 2017-09-21
. 1993). This is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Second, if the initial joinder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12405 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
The Estate of Steven Michael Bydalek v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
review an order for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12462 - 2017-09-21
review an order for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12462 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was sufficient to sustain a guilty verdict presents a legal question that we review de novo. State v. Smith
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040275 - 2025-11-20
was sufficient to sustain a guilty verdict presents a legal question that we review de novo. State v. Smith
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040275 - 2025-11-20