Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21271 - 21280 of 63986 for records/1000.
Search results 21271 - 21280 of 63986 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084626 - 2026-03-03
2 response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084626 - 2026-03-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084626 - 2026-03-03
2 response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084626 - 2026-03-03
State v. Gabriel J. Alwin
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10865 - 2005-03-31
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10865 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109121 - 2014-03-18
elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109121 - 2014-03-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250973 - 2019-12-04
responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250973 - 2019-12-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259305 - 2020-05-05
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259305 - 2020-05-05
COURT OF APPEALS
an armed robbery. Her argues that his record does not justify such a long sentence, and that it is harsh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32464 - 2008-04-16
an armed robbery. Her argues that his record does not justify such a long sentence, and that it is harsh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32464 - 2008-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are unable to determine the correct amount owed from the record before this court, we vacate the December
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111136 - 2017-09-21
are unable to determine the correct amount owed from the record before this court, we vacate the December
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111136 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. D.P. filed a response.2 After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and D.P.’s response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371805 - 2021-06-02
. D.P. filed a response.2 After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and D.P.’s response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371805 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
State v. Eduardo Perez
1 The record of the Monroe County Circuit Court case was not appended to the record in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9778 - 2017-09-19
1 The record of the Monroe County Circuit Court case was not appended to the record in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9778 - 2017-09-19