Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21281 - 21290 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 21281 - 21290 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
able to obtain comparable evidence by other reasonably available means. Hurst claims that the loss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39278 - 2009-08-10
able to obtain comparable evidence by other reasonably available means. Hurst claims that the loss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39278 - 2009-08-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
imposed by the court.” Potts claimed that when he “got back to prison after the plea to first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198087 - 2017-10-24
imposed by the court.” Potts claimed that when he “got back to prison after the plea to first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198087 - 2017-10-24
[PDF]
State v. Jaruthh M. Gathings
to hitting Marlow in the head with a cinder block, but claimed the act was done in self-defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9313 - 2017-09-19
to hitting Marlow in the head with a cinder block, but claimed the act was done in self-defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9313 - 2017-09-19
Marc J. Ackerman v. Malcolm K. Hatfield
$90,000 and Dr. Ackerman agreed to dismiss all claims pending at the time. ¶6 Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7459 - 2005-03-31
$90,000 and Dr. Ackerman agreed to dismiss all claims pending at the time. ¶6 Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7459 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” postconviction motion, filed after the circuit court had orally denied relief on Burroughs’ original claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193266 - 2017-09-21
” postconviction motion, filed after the circuit court had orally denied relief on Burroughs’ original claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193266 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
The State appeals,[1] arguing the court applied an incorrect standard of law to its nuisance claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31742 - 2008-02-04
The State appeals,[1] arguing the court applied an incorrect standard of law to its nuisance claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31742 - 2008-02-04
[PDF]
State v. Glenn E. Hadley
. On appeal, Hadley claims that he should be granted a new trial in the interest of justice because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11146 - 2017-09-19
. On appeal, Hadley claims that he should be granted a new trial in the interest of justice because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11146 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a postjudgment motion to the trial court, which held a Machner[6] hearing on Rick’s claim of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33423 - 2008-07-16
a postjudgment motion to the trial court, which held a Machner[6] hearing on Rick’s claim of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33423 - 2008-07-16
Thomas G. Nejedlo v. School District of Wausaukee
the trial court erroneously determined governmental immunity barred his claim and erroneously granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18378 - 2005-05-31
the trial court erroneously determined governmental immunity barred his claim and erroneously granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18378 - 2005-05-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
not address Rick’s other claims of trial errors. No. 2007AP2618 3 Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33423 - 2014-09-15
not address Rick’s other claims of trial errors. No. 2007AP2618 3 Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33423 - 2014-09-15