Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21281 - 21290 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 21281 - 21290 of 63981 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736835 - 2023-12-07
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736835 - 2023-12-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144401 - 2017-09-21
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144401 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eugene Henry Jensen
of the record shows that Attorney Ruth diligently and aptly represented Jensen during these long proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6323 - 2005-03-31
of the record shows that Attorney Ruth diligently and aptly represented Jensen during these long proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6323 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keith D. McEvoy
inadequate; and (2) the sentence was excessive. On review of the record, this court is satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14641 - 2005-03-31
inadequate; and (2) the sentence was excessive. On review of the record, this court is satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14641 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
judgment. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124594 - 2014-10-21
judgment. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124594 - 2014-10-21
State v. Robert T. Langston
.[1] Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11318 - 2005-03-31
.[1] Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11318 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and conducting an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458943 - 2021-12-07
and conducting an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458943 - 2021-12-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=623741 - 2023-02-22
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=623741 - 2023-02-22
[PDF]
Thomas Ponchik v. Jeffrey Endicott
the imposition of discipline on the grounds that “the record contains insufficient evidence upon which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14228 - 2014-09-15
the imposition of discipline on the grounds that “the record contains insufficient evidence upon which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14228 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Eugene Henry Jensen
by the prosecution. We reject Jensen’s claims for two reasons. First, our review of the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6323 - 2017-09-19
by the prosecution. We reject Jensen’s claims for two reasons. First, our review of the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6323 - 2017-09-19