Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21291 - 21300 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21291 - 21300 of 30242 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the defendant.” Id. at 451. Whether the requisite showing is made is a legal issue that we determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32640 - 2008-05-13
of the defendant.” Id. at 451. Whether the requisite showing is made is a legal issue that we determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32640 - 2008-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpret right of first refusal language as we do other contract language, applying de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169972 - 2017-09-21
interpret right of first refusal language as we do other contract language, applying de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169972 - 2017-09-21
Gregory Spinner and Marianne Giannis v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment, Inc
of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v. Waukesha County Bd. of Supervisors, 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12766 - 2005-03-31
of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v. Waukesha County Bd. of Supervisors, 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12766 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and substantial breach of the plea agreement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57475 - 2014-09-15
and substantial breach of the plea agreement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57475 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Houghton Wood Products, Inc. v. Badger Wood Products, Inc.
of summary judgment is de novo. Green Springs Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 314-15, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8455 - 2017-09-19
of summary judgment is de novo. Green Springs Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 314-15, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8455 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
The Estate of Shawn Merrill v. Joseph Jerrick
of action … for … damage to the person ….” No. 99-0787 3 ¶4 We review a summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15299 - 2017-09-21
of action … for … damage to the person ….” No. 99-0787 3 ¶4 We review a summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15299 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 5
postconviction motion violates a person’s due process rights presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35025 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion violates a person’s due process rights presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35025 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment de novo, “applying the same methodology as the circuit court but benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789716 - 2024-04-16
of summary judgment de novo, “applying the same methodology as the circuit court but benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789716 - 2024-04-16
[PDF]
WI APP 31
de novo. See Century Fence Co. v. American Sewer Servs., Inc., 2021 WI App 75, ¶8, 399 Wis. 2d 742
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792437 - 2024-06-20
de novo. See Century Fence Co. v. American Sewer Servs., Inc., 2021 WI App 75, ¶8, 399 Wis. 2d 742
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792437 - 2024-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60436 - 2011-03-01
). Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60436 - 2011-03-01