Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21291 - 21300 of 63986 for records/1000.
Search results 21291 - 21300 of 63986 for records/1000.
State v. Eduardo Perez
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] The record of the Monroe County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9778 - 2005-03-31
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] The record of the Monroe County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9778 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699527 - 2023-09-06
an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699527 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084626 - 2026-03-03
2 response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084626 - 2026-03-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084626 - 2026-03-03
2 response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084626 - 2026-03-03
State v. Gabriel J. Alwin
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10865 - 2005-03-31
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10865 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109121 - 2014-03-18
elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109121 - 2014-03-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250973 - 2019-12-04
responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250973 - 2019-12-04
COURT OF APPEALS
The circuit court made the following remarks at sentencing. Agnew had a “terrible record,” faced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111778 - 2014-05-06
The circuit court made the following remarks at sentencing. Agnew had a “terrible record,” faced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111778 - 2014-05-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
prison nurses and their supervisor. Upon our review of the parties’ briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101872 - 2017-09-21
prison nurses and their supervisor. Upon our review of the parties’ briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101872 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259305 - 2020-05-05
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259305 - 2020-05-05