Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21291 - 21300 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 21291 - 21300 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on that basis. We find that reasonable suspicion was amply demonstrated on this record and accordingly affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307830 - 2020-11-25
on that basis. We find that reasonable suspicion was amply demonstrated on this record and accordingly affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307830 - 2020-11-25
[PDF]
State v. Barbara A. Buettner
off the record, and defense counsel then informed the court that Buettner had
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12349 - 2017-09-21
off the record, and defense counsel then informed the court that Buettner had
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12349 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), no issues of arguable merit appear
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147090 - 2015-08-20
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), no issues of arguable merit appear
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147090 - 2015-08-20
State v. Edward C. Brandau
the speedy trial issue because the record conclusively shows that Brandau's speedy trial rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10140 - 2005-03-31
the speedy trial issue because the record conclusively shows that Brandau's speedy trial rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10140 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134281 - 2015-01-29
. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134281 - 2015-01-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Bailey was sent copies of the reports, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing both records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235897 - 2019-02-22
. Bailey was sent copies of the reports, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing both records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235897 - 2019-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
surcharges. This court can only review matters of record in the trial court and cannot consider new matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36866 - 2009-06-22
surcharges. This court can only review matters of record in the trial court and cannot consider new matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36866 - 2009-06-22
State v. David A. H.
N.W.2d 30 (1998). A court properly exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3558 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 30 (1998). A court properly exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3558 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the record, we affirm the judgment because there is no arguable merit to any issue that can be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94386 - 2013-03-26
of the record, we affirm the judgment because there is no arguable merit to any issue that can be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94386 - 2013-03-26
Susan P. Huycke-Sossaman v. Dean K. Sossaman
, but not the CD. The record supports these findings. The circuit court, however, did not specifically identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2910 - 2005-03-31
, but not the CD. The record supports these findings. The circuit court, however, did not specifically identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2910 - 2005-03-31