Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2131 - 2140 of 21449 for warrants.
Search results 2131 - 2140 of 21449 for warrants.
Leonard L. Jones v. State
be seized by any officer or [designated] employee,” either with a warrant, under a judgment or, if incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31
be seized by any officer or [designated] employee,” either with a warrant, under a judgment or, if incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31
Irving G. Wenzel v. Washburn County
the answer was not warranted by existing law nor a good faith argument for the extension, modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8767 - 2005-03-31
the answer was not warranted by existing law nor a good faith argument for the extension, modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8767 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael Daniels
be shit” warranted a mistrial. To obtain a conviction for second-degree assault, the State had to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9988 - 2017-09-19
be shit” warranted a mistrial. To obtain a conviction for second-degree assault, the State had to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9988 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court erroneously rejected Hunter’s claim that a new factor warrants sentence modification. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58253 - 2010-12-27
the circuit court erroneously rejected Hunter’s claim that a new factor warrants sentence modification. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58253 - 2010-12-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
resentencing. Hereford contends that the State breached the plea agreement, that a new factor warranted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116159 - 2017-09-21
resentencing. Hereford contends that the State breached the plea agreement, that a new factor warranted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116159 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that a postsentencing diagnosis of hypothyroidism was a new factor warranting resentencing. We reject Pruett’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85756 - 2014-09-15
that a postsentencing diagnosis of hypothyroidism was a new factor warranting resentencing. We reject Pruett’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85756 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” [Terry, 392 U.S.] at 21. These facts must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27127 - 2006-11-13
inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” [Terry, 392 U.S.] at 21. These facts must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27127 - 2006-11-13
[PDF]
Leonard L. Jones v. State
subsection “may be seized by any officer or [designated] employee,” either with a warrant, under a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13259 - 2017-09-21
subsection “may be seized by any officer or [designated] employee,” either with a warrant, under a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13259 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not warrant suppression. See State v. Minett, 2014 WI App 40, ¶1, 353 Wis. 2d 484, 846 N.W.2d 831
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416776 - 2021-08-31
not warrant suppression. See State v. Minett, 2014 WI App 40, ¶1, 353 Wis. 2d 484, 846 N.W.2d 831
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416776 - 2021-08-31
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Johnson
was justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement is subject to this court's de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9964 - 2017-09-19
was justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement is subject to this court's de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9964 - 2017-09-19