Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2131 - 2140 of 21731 for warrants.
Search results 2131 - 2140 of 21731 for warrants.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. conducted in 2006 while he was in prison is a new factor warranting sentence modification.1 We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946529 - 2025-04-29
. conducted in 2006 while he was in prison is a new factor warranting sentence modification.1 We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946529 - 2025-04-29
City of Milwaukee v. Sammie L. Glass
claiming the right to possession of property seized with or without a search warrant to seek the property’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15972 - 2005-03-31
claiming the right to possession of property seized with or without a search warrant to seek the property’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15972 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not warrant suppression. See State v. Minett, 2014 WI App 40, ¶1, 353 Wis. 2d 484, 846 N.W.2d 831
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416776 - 2021-08-31
not warrant suppression. See State v. Minett, 2014 WI App 40, ¶1, 353 Wis. 2d 484, 846 N.W.2d 831
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416776 - 2021-08-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
resentencing. Hereford contends that the State breached the plea agreement, that a new factor warranted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116159 - 2017-09-21
resentencing. Hereford contends that the State breached the plea agreement, that a new factor warranted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116159 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
those facts warrant suppression. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53317 - 2014-09-15
those facts warrant suppression. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53317 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as a repeat offender. The charges were based upon materials seized pursuant to a search warrant obtained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609460 - 2023-01-10
as a repeat offender. The charges were based upon materials seized pursuant to a search warrant obtained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609460 - 2023-01-10
[PDF]
Leonard L. Jones v. State
subsection “may be seized by any officer or [designated] employee,” either with a warrant, under a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13259 - 2017-09-21
subsection “may be seized by any officer or [designated] employee,” either with a warrant, under a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13259 - 2017-09-21
Leonard L. Jones v. State
be seized by any officer or [designated] employee,” either with a warrant, under a judgment or, if incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31
be seized by any officer or [designated] employee,” either with a warrant, under a judgment or, if incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31
Irving G. Wenzel v. Washburn County
the answer was not warranted by existing law nor a good faith argument for the extension, modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8767 - 2005-03-31
the answer was not warranted by existing law nor a good faith argument for the extension, modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8767 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that a postsentencing diagnosis of hypothyroidism was a new factor warranting resentencing. We reject Pruett’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85756 - 2014-09-15
that a postsentencing diagnosis of hypothyroidism was a new factor warranting resentencing. We reject Pruett’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85756 - 2014-09-15