Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21301 - 21310 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21301 - 21310 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Thomas H. Highman
we review de novo, although we uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3735 - 2017-09-19
we review de novo, although we uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3735 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
solely at a question of law. We review questions of law de novo. United Rentals, Inc. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63999 - 2014-09-15
solely at a question of law. We review questions of law de novo. United Rentals, Inc. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63999 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David S. Frederick
review de novo whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial. Id. Frederick argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13795 - 2014-09-15
review de novo whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial. Id. Frederick argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13795 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David Beilfuss v. Huffy Corporation
. No. 03-2006 4 Interpretation of a contract is a question of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6718 - 2017-09-20
. No. 03-2006 4 Interpretation of a contract is a question of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6718 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
of law that this court reviews de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35044 - 2014-09-15
of law that this court reviews de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35044 - 2014-09-15
State v. Derrick Sandles
[this court] review[s] de novo.” State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417, 424, 569 N.W.2d 84 (1997). ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5719 - 2005-03-31
[this court] review[s] de novo.” State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417, 424, 569 N.W.2d 84 (1997). ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5719 - 2005-03-31
State v. Diane M. Mikic
performance prejudiced the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. Here, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12297 - 2005-03-31
performance prejudiced the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. Here, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 262
reasonable interpretation available. We apply de novo review when “there is no evidence that the agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31005 - 2014-09-15
reasonable interpretation available. We apply de novo review when “there is no evidence that the agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31005 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jasmina Ivankovic v. Barbara Giuliani
standard in determining damages is a question of law which we review de novo. See Jauquet Lumber Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15378 - 2017-09-21
standard in determining damages is a question of law which we review de novo. See Jauquet Lumber Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15378 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. S.A.M., 402 Wis. 2d 379, ¶17. ¶17 In S.A.M., our supreme court addressed the mootness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722400 - 2023-10-31
reviews de novo. S.A.M., 402 Wis. 2d 379, ¶17. ¶17 In S.A.M., our supreme court addressed the mootness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722400 - 2023-10-31