Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21311 - 21320 of 83001 for case codes/1000.

[PDF] NOTICE
to deliver, and possessing a firearm as a felon (“cocaine-marijuana-firearm” case).2 For the cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40989 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Warren D. Patek v. Peggy A. Stearns
and granted Badger Mutual summary judgment. Patek appeals. By order dated March 11, 1997, this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12122 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
was an impression that I had when I first handled this case when the officers brought it to me, when I read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44711 - 2009-12-16

State v. Keyun Utsey
This case has a somewhat protracted procedural history, which is unnecessary to recite for the purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19728 - 2005-09-26

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
was binding under Wis. Stat. § 807.05. However, principles of contract law may apply in some cases under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27332 - 2006-12-04

Warren D. Patek v. Peggy A. Stearns
. By order dated March 11, 1997, this case was submitted to the court on the expedited appeals calendar. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12122 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778878 - 2024-03-27

State v. Michael D. Drescher
refusal. Because the trial court erred in concluding that the arrest in this case was valid, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20082 - 2007-06-04

[PDF] NOTICE
separate offenses, arising from four Iron County Circuit Court cases—three counts of disorderly conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43887 - 2014-09-15

Edward M. Moran v. Property Management Concepts
We conclude the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in hearing the three cases together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7403 - 2005-03-31