Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21321 - 21330 of 64756 for b's.
Search results 21321 - 21330 of 64756 for b's.
[PDF]
State v. Justin David Schwartz
of the circuit court for Racine County: ALLAN B. TORHORST, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J.1 Justin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7220 - 2017-09-20
of the circuit court for Racine County: ALLAN B. TORHORST, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J.1 Justin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7220 - 2017-09-20
Douglas County v. Steven Leinweber
vehicle on a public highway, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 346.63(1)(a), (1)(b), 346.935.[2] The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2225 - 2005-03-31
vehicle on a public highway, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 346.63(1)(a), (1)(b), 346.935.[2] The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2225 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of Rule 809.19(2)(a) and (b), should not be found and why counsel should not be required to pay $150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58602 - 2011-12-19
of Rule 809.19(2)(a) and (b), should not be found and why counsel should not be required to pay $150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58602 - 2011-12-19
State v. Jesse J. C.
. § 805.17(2) (1999-2000).[3] In addition, “[b]ecause the exercise of discretion is so essential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2743 - 2005-03-31
. § 805.17(2) (1999-2000).[3] In addition, “[b]ecause the exercise of discretion is so essential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2743 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: JUAN B. COLáS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94358 - 2013-03-20
a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: JUAN B. COLáS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94358 - 2013-03-20
Anne E. Czarnecki v. Paul A. Czarnecki
claim. B. Written Order Requiring Dr. Matusiak to Remain on the Case. Gerard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10281 - 2005-03-31
claim. B. Written Order Requiring Dr. Matusiak to Remain on the Case. Gerard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10281 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
jeopardy was not violated. B. New Factor ¶12 Haizel also contends that the DOC’s failure to place him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372580 - 2021-06-02
jeopardy was not violated. B. New Factor ¶12 Haizel also contends that the DOC’s failure to place him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372580 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
State v. Stacy D. Davis
with an offer of proof. See WIS. STAT. § 901.03(1)(b). Accordingly, we do not address this issue directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3403 - 2017-09-19
with an offer of proof. See WIS. STAT. § 901.03(1)(b). Accordingly, we do not address this issue directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3403 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Devontes D. Harris
by the instructions. This court also finds no evidence the jury was misled by the instructions. B. Prosecutorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18848 - 2017-09-21
by the instructions. This court also finds no evidence the jury was misled by the instructions. B. Prosecutorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18848 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the reasons for its sentencing decision and, except as provided in par. (b), shall do so in open court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36518 - 2014-09-15
the reasons for its sentencing decision and, except as provided in par. (b), shall do so in open court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36518 - 2014-09-15