Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21321 - 21330 of 46137 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 21321 - 21330 of 46137 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
two tests: first, that counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994986 - 2025-08-13
two tests: first, that counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994986 - 2025-08-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-part test. See Hoseman, 334 Wis. 2d 415, ¶16. Under the first part of the test, the restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94791 - 2014-09-15
-part test. See Hoseman, 334 Wis. 2d 415, ¶16. Under the first part of the test, the restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94791 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the transaction, he/she made contact with officers, who recovered rocks that tested positive for cocaine
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133309 - 2017-09-21
the transaction, he/she made contact with officers, who recovered rocks that tested positive for cocaine
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133309 - 2017-09-21
Paul Johns v. County of Oneida
., is to apply the "extraordinary circumstances" test. Id. at 549, 363 N.W.2d at 425. Under this test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9776 - 2005-03-31
., is to apply the "extraordinary circumstances" test. Id. at 549, 363 N.W.2d at 425. Under this test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9776 - 2005-03-31
State v. Earl W. Haase
. Stat. § 973.20.” ¶12 We do not see how the State’s proposed test reconciles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24928 - 2006-05-30
. Stat. § 973.20.” ¶12 We do not see how the State’s proposed test reconciles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24928 - 2006-05-30
State v. Guy N. Giese
the prejudice prong of the two-part test, we recognize that by its very nature nearly all evidence operates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10925 - 2005-03-31
the prejudice prong of the two-part test, we recognize that by its very nature nearly all evidence operates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10925 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 369. ¶7 The familiar two-pronged test for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46536 - 2010-02-01
.2d 369. ¶7 The familiar two-pronged test for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46536 - 2010-02-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are from that trial. ¶3 Johnson testified she test drove and then purchased the car, with the owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165637 - 2017-09-21
are from that trial. ¶3 Johnson testified she test drove and then purchased the car, with the owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165637 - 2017-09-21
State v. Amy M. Yulga
conducting the pat-down search, the officer asked the passenger to submit to a preliminary breath test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18029 - 2005-05-04
conducting the pat-down search, the officer asked the passenger to submit to a preliminary breath test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18029 - 2005-05-04
Village of Slinger v. City of Hartford
of Hartford’s (Town) right to test the validity of the City’s annexation proceedings. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4671 - 2005-03-31
of Hartford’s (Town) right to test the validity of the City’s annexation proceedings. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4671 - 2005-03-31