Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21321 - 21330 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 21321 - 21330 of 64042 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
by the revisions made on remand, and we are unable to determine the correct amount owed from the record before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111136 - 2014-04-28
by the revisions made on remand, and we are unable to determine the correct amount owed from the record before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111136 - 2014-04-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699527 - 2023-09-06
an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699527 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2022AP512-CRNM 2 record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699548 - 2023-09-06
. No. 2022AP512-CRNM 2 record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699548 - 2023-09-06
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102475 - 2013-09-25
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102475 - 2013-09-25
State v. Edward C. Brandau
the speedy trial issue because the record conclusively shows that Brandau's speedy trial rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10139 - 2005-03-31
the speedy trial issue because the record conclusively shows that Brandau's speedy trial rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10139 - 2005-03-31
James Dailey v. Rita Dailey
that the court which entered the initial order intended to equalize the award of income.[1] The record, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6119 - 2005-03-31
that the court which entered the initial order intended to equalize the award of income.[1] The record, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6119 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=527018 - 2022-06-01
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=527018 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Bailey was sent copies of the reports, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing both records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235897 - 2019-02-22
. Bailey was sent copies of the reports, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing both records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235897 - 2019-02-22
[PDF]
State v. Edward C. Brandau
and that Brandau was not prejudiced by their failure to raise the speedy trial issue because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10139 - 2017-09-19
and that Brandau was not prejudiced by their failure to raise the speedy trial issue because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10139 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Edward C. Brandau
and that Brandau was not prejudiced by their failure to raise the speedy trial issue because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10141 - 2017-09-19
and that Brandau was not prejudiced by their failure to raise the speedy trial issue because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10141 - 2017-09-19