Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21331 - 21340 of 58338 for speedy trial.

Judi Ann Koonce v. George Earl Koonce
is required to pay an additional sum of $75,000. The trial court concluded that the agreement was unambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2944 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Patrick C. Webster
denying postconviction relief. The issues concern whether the trial court properly sentenced him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13368 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Tony L. Gadicke
and an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises several issues related to his trial. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6316 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
towards a group of people near a garage, and then quickly fled. At trial, the State presented several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37750 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Patrick C. Webster
denying postconviction relief. The issues concern whether the trial court properly sentenced him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13367 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
the trial court erred by applying the amended version of § 814.04(2) retroactively to award a substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26924 - 2006-10-25

Michelle Kukla v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
coverage under policies issued by Farmers Insurance Exchange. Because we conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10333 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John S. Spicer
of trial counsel. We reject all of Spicer’s arguments and affirm. ¶2 Spicer argues that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21627 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Robert W. Wilcoxson
Wilcoxson appeals the trial court's modification of his sentence from one concurrent to one consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11466 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Charles L. Klaeser
He contends that the trial court should have suppressed evidence of a chemical test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12234 - 2017-09-21