Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21341 - 21350 of 98582 for civil court case status online.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
taking a case to trial. The circuit court went on to find that “there is no basis here to guarantee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608384 - 2023-01-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, by the Oregon appellate court’s ruling. Where facts of a case from another jurisdiction jibe with those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257706 - 2020-04-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court, in most instances the parties’ papers and court orders in each case were identical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248893 - 2019-10-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the two statements that were made by the victims in this case.” Ultimately, the circuit court imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169768 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
precedence over other cases in the circuit court. Following a de novo trial, the circuit court makes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164139 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court saw this as “a close case.” It addressed five factors it believed to be law enforcement’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431822 - 2021-09-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in finding the motion to reopen the receivership case frivolous. Our review of a circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237538 - 2019-03-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 25, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370396 - 2021-05-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 10, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173389 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 10, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481404 - 2022-02-10