Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21341 - 21350 of 29740 for des.
Search results 21341 - 21350 of 29740 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Steenberg Homes, Inc.
of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 365, 560 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13518 - 2017-09-21
of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 365, 560 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13518 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ilse C. Wood v. Gerald G. Wood, Jr.
We perform summary judgment analysis de novo, applying the same methodology employed by circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6811 - 2017-09-20
We perform summary judgment analysis de novo, applying the same methodology employed by circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6811 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 24
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. DOR v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc., 2007 WI 27, ¶26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=506357 - 2022-06-08
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. DOR v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc., 2007 WI 27, ¶26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=506357 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. See State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197217 - 2017-10-05
of law we review de novo. See State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197217 - 2017-10-05
[PDF]
Gregory A. Gensler v. Doris J. Vander Kooi
review de novo. Edlin v. Soderstrom, 83 Wis. 2d 58, 69, 264 N.W.2d 275 (1978). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7115 - 2017-09-20
review de novo. Edlin v. Soderstrom, 83 Wis. 2d 58, 69, 264 N.W.2d 275 (1978). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7115 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment de novo, “applying the same methodology as the circuit court but benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789716 - 2024-04-16
of summary judgment de novo, “applying the same methodology as the circuit court but benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789716 - 2024-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61921 - 2011-03-28
. This is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61921 - 2011-03-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-16, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30066 - 2014-09-15
is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-16, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30066 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Shawn R. Lee
facts, is a question of law which we decide de novo, without deference to the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13055 - 2017-09-21
facts, is a question of law which we decide de novo, without deference to the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13055 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kerby G. Denman
of the relationship between WIS. STAT. § 980.05(1m) and (2) presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15747 - 2017-09-21
of the relationship between WIS. STAT. § 980.05(1m) and (2) presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15747 - 2017-09-21