Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21351 - 21360 of 64027 for records/1000.
Search results 21351 - 21360 of 64027 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. D.P. filed a response.2 After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and D.P.’s response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371805 - 2021-06-02
. D.P. filed a response.2 After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and D.P.’s response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371805 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. John S.
to any child predator who becomes aware of it. 4 The portions of the record cited by the parties do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25954 - 2017-09-21
to any child predator who becomes aware of it. 4 The portions of the record cited by the parties do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25954 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98531 - 2013-06-23
, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98531 - 2013-06-23
COURT OF APPEALS
The circuit court made the following remarks at sentencing. Agnew had a “terrible record,” faced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111778 - 2014-05-06
The circuit court made the following remarks at sentencing. Agnew had a “terrible record,” faced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111778 - 2014-05-06
CA Blank Order
of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The petition alleged that Karen is mentally ill and a proper
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95445 - 2013-04-15
of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The petition alleged that Karen is mentally ill and a proper
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95445 - 2013-04-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the appellate record. Absent exceptional circumstances not applicable here, we do not consider “assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120140 - 2014-08-25
of the appellate record. Absent exceptional circumstances not applicable here, we do not consider “assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120140 - 2014-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
As the Board correctly points out, the appellate record does not include any document establishing that Slocum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88200 - 2012-10-15
As the Board correctly points out, the appellate record does not include any document establishing that Slocum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88200 - 2012-10-15
Jill L. Schwenkhoff v. Ronald O. Schwenkhoff
in setting child support because the record does not support the income figure it used for her former husband
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7915 - 2005-03-31
in setting child support because the record does not support the income figure it used for her former husband
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7915 - 2005-03-31
State v. Luegene Hampton
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9935 - 2005-03-31
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9935 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194041 - 2017-09-21
Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194041 - 2017-09-21