Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21361 - 21370 of 29796 for des.
Search results 21361 - 21370 of 29796 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d at 339. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91094 - 2013-01-02
N.W.2d at 339. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91094 - 2013-01-02
State v. Pablo R.
. The interpretation or application of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2386 - 2005-03-31
. The interpretation or application of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2386 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Corrina L. Deichsel
constitutes a “new factor” presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a “new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6404 - 2017-09-19
constitutes a “new factor” presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a “new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6404 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing. This is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171761 - 2017-09-21
, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing. This is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171761 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Sir S. M. L.
. DISCUSSION ¶6 The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Jeremy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19779 - 2017-09-21
. DISCUSSION ¶6 The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Jeremy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19779 - 2017-09-21
Gerald T. Niedert v. Donald Geller
methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment was appropriate. See Coopman v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11865 - 2005-03-31
methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment was appropriate. See Coopman v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11865 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frederick F. Hafemann
of reasonableness is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Whitrock, 161 Wis.2d 960, 973, 468 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8994 - 2005-03-31
of reasonableness is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Whitrock, 161 Wis.2d 960, 973, 468 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8994 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was a reasonable amount. This appeal follows. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶14 We review de novo the grant and denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65083 - 2011-05-31
was a reasonable amount. This appeal follows. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶14 We review de novo the grant and denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65083 - 2011-05-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. See id. Adequate Provocation ¶19 Adequate provocation is an affirmative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258774 - 2020-04-28
we review de novo. See id. Adequate Provocation ¶19 Adequate provocation is an affirmative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258774 - 2020-04-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a circuit court’s decision on summary judgment is de novo. Behrendt v. Gulf Underwriters Ins. Co., 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186155 - 2017-09-21
of a circuit court’s decision on summary judgment is de novo. Behrendt v. Gulf Underwriters Ins. Co., 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186155 - 2017-09-21