Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21361 - 21370 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.

CA Blank Order
constricted, and she had fresh needle marks on her arms. After Bork failed field sobriety tests, the officer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132022 - 2014-12-17

[PDF] Tricia L. Cefalu v. Continental Western Insurance Company
enter a field that has no sensible or just stopping point. ¶11 The test of cause-in-fact is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18844 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶9 Officers testified that inside the gun case was an envelope with two test-fired .40 caliber
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015033 - 2025-09-24

[PDF] NOTICE
.” Id. The United States Supreme Court has developed a test, the Townsend/Tucker test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30845 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Milwaukee Police Association v. The City of Milwaukee
Teachers adopted a three-factor test to determine whether attorneys fees should be awarded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12247 - 2017-09-21

State v. Mark A. Flagstadt
are not probationers. See id. at 21-22. “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a commonsense test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5585 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
evidence pursuant to the three-part test from State v. Sullivan, 216 Wis. 2d 768, 771-73, 576 N.W.2d 30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1089580 - 2026-03-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 380 U.S. 609, 614 (1965). “The test for determining if there has been an impermissible comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98739 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
are virtually unchallengeable.” Id. at 690. ¶12 The prejudice prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34575 - 2014-09-15

State v. Johnny Lacy
claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to seek independent DNA testing, but again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16081 - 2005-03-31