Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21371 - 21380 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
Search results 21371 - 21380 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be considered to warrant reversal.” Id. ¶19 In this case, the first question is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186350 - 2017-09-21
be considered to warrant reversal.” Id. ¶19 In this case, the first question is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186350 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
our conclusion that double damages are appropriate in this case. First, the court recognized, as we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118461 - 2014-09-15
our conclusion that double damages are appropriate in this case. First, the court recognized, as we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118461 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this case to the circuit court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. BACKGROUND ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677427 - 2023-07-11
this case to the circuit court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. BACKGROUND ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677427 - 2023-07-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was dismissed.5 In support of A.G.’s plea, testimony was taken from the case manager, K.K. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483897 - 2022-02-15
was dismissed.5 In support of A.G.’s plea, testimony was taken from the case manager, K.K. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483897 - 2022-02-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 2, 2023 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685413 - 2023-08-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 2, 2023 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685413 - 2023-08-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. If grounds are found by the court, the parent is found “unfit,” WIS. STAT. § 48.424(4), and the case moves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000306 - 2025-08-26
. If grounds are found by the court, the parent is found “unfit,” WIS. STAT. § 48.424(4), and the case moves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000306 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
misconduct in the unrelated cases is newly discovered evidence warranting a new trial. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886263 - 2024-12-11
misconduct in the unrelated cases is newly discovered evidence warranting a new trial. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886263 - 2024-12-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” The court set the case for trial. Six months later—by now, December 2017—Brooks filed another motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239432 - 2019-04-24
.” The court set the case for trial. Six months later—by now, December 2017—Brooks filed another motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239432 - 2019-04-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In at least one case decided after Tourville, however, this court has continued to use the de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271992 - 2020-07-23
. In at least one case decided after Tourville, however, this court has continued to use the de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271992 - 2020-07-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the CHIPS dispositional orders for this case, that element was included in the trial court’s consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233694 - 2019-01-29
in the CHIPS dispositional orders for this case, that element was included in the trial court’s consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233694 - 2019-01-29