Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21371 - 21380 of 49829 for our.
Search results 21371 - 21380 of 49829 for our.
State v. Kenneth J. Pounds
should have used the verdict date, of March 9, 1988, under our holding in State v. Wimmer, 152 Wis.2d 654
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11066 - 2005-03-31
should have used the verdict date, of March 9, 1988, under our holding in State v. Wimmer, 152 Wis.2d 654
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11066 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
correctly analyzes the issues it raises as without merit, and we will not discuss them further. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=950351 - 2025-05-07
correctly analyzes the issues it raises as without merit, and we will not discuss them further. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=950351 - 2025-05-07
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
these appeals on our own motion. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2011-12 version
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95258 - 2014-09-15
these appeals on our own motion. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2011-12 version
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95258 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as without merit, and this court will not discuss them further. Our review of the record discloses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251100 - 2019-12-11
as without merit, and this court will not discuss them further. Our review of the record discloses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251100 - 2019-12-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
will not discuss them further. Our review of the Record discloses no other potential issues for appeal.3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=695227 - 2023-08-30
will not discuss them further. Our review of the Record discloses no other potential issues for appeal.3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=695227 - 2023-08-30
CA Blank Order
matters. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96255 - 2013-04-30
matters. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96255 - 2013-04-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
further. Our review of the records discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Accordingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593597 - 2022-11-23
further. Our review of the records discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Accordingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593597 - 2022-11-23
CA Blank Order
are satisfied that they do not present an issue of arguable merit. Our independent review of the record does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104541 - 2013-11-19
are satisfied that they do not present an issue of arguable merit. Our independent review of the record does
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104541 - 2013-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156664 - 2017-09-21
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156664 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
them further. Our independent review of the record does not disclose any potentially meritorious issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139945 - 2015-04-21
them further. Our independent review of the record does not disclose any potentially meritorious issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139945 - 2015-04-21