Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21381 - 21390 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21381 - 21390 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
State v. David S. Frederick
review de novo whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial. Id. Frederick argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13795 - 2014-09-15
review de novo whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial. Id. Frederick argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13795 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; bracketing supplied by Plude). This final determination presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117597 - 2017-09-21
; bracketing supplied by Plude). This final determination presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117597 - 2017-09-21
State v. Elmer J. K.
to engage in contract interpretation. Construction of a contract is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14280 - 2005-03-31
to engage in contract interpretation. Construction of a contract is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14280 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the probable cause standard. See id. This court reviews that question de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136330 - 2015-03-03
the probable cause standard. See id. This court reviews that question de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136330 - 2015-03-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2016AP800 5 DISCUSSION ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189392 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2016AP800 5 DISCUSSION ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189392 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Certification
under a given factual scenario is a question of law that [the appellate court] reviews de novo.” Id
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192262 - 2017-09-21
under a given factual scenario is a question of law that [the appellate court] reviews de novo.” Id
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192262 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Michael W. Bruzas v. Cipriano Quezada-Garcia
but would review them de novo.” Id. In so holding, the court rejected the employer’s related argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2114 - 2017-09-19
but would review them de novo.” Id. In so holding, the court rejected the employer’s related argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2114 - 2017-09-19
Keith Love v. John Eversman
judgment is well known. In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13772 - 2005-03-31
judgment is well known. In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13772 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI APP 228
by the child witness in the presence of the defendant is more than de minimis, i.e., more than ‘mere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26934 - 2006-11-20
by the child witness in the presence of the defendant is more than de minimis, i.e., more than ‘mere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26934 - 2006-11-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
judgment in favor of Holter. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same method
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60365 - 2014-09-15
judgment in favor of Holter. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same method
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60365 - 2014-09-15