Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21391 - 21400 of 83948 for case search.
Search results 21391 - 21400 of 83948 for case search.
State v. Fred J. Odell
an order denying postconviction relief.[2] The complaint alleged that on August 11, 1992, in case number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9552 - 2005-03-31
an order denying postconviction relief.[2] The complaint alleged that on August 11, 1992, in case number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9552 - 2005-03-31
State v. Fred J. Odell
an order denying postconviction relief.[2] The complaint alleged that on August 11, 1992, in case number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9273 - 2005-03-31
an order denying postconviction relief.[2] The complaint alleged that on August 11, 1992, in case number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9273 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This case concerns a foreclosure and also a restaurant sale that involved some of the same parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136997 - 2017-09-21
This case concerns a foreclosure and also a restaurant sale that involved some of the same parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136997 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Laura Walters
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0828-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13785 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0828-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13785 - 2014-09-15
State v. Harry S. Bernstein
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2259
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14351 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2259
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14351 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2006AP285-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2004CF93
or, at a minimum, clarification. In the present case, the parties’ arguments are focused on applying the current
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29495 - 2014-09-15
or, at a minimum, clarification. In the present case, the parties’ arguments are focused on applying the current
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29495 - 2014-09-15
State v. Francis P. Hughes
. Accordingly, we reverse the conviction and remand the case for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2721 - 2005-03-31
. Accordingly, we reverse the conviction and remand the case for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2721 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 159
2008 WI App 159 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP1126 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34172 - 2008-10-26
2008 WI App 159 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP1126 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34172 - 2008-10-26
State v. Laura Walters
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0828-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13785 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0828-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13785 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to either parent. The conditions for J.D.C., Jr. included resolving his criminal cases and committing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570723 - 2022-09-27
to either parent. The conditions for J.D.C., Jr. included resolving his criminal cases and committing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=570723 - 2022-09-27