Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21391 - 21400 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21391 - 21400 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, ‘we grant deference only to the [trial] court’s findings of historical fact. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197435 - 2017-10-10
, ‘we grant deference only to the [trial] court’s findings of historical fact. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197435 - 2017-10-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence is,” and if the court omitted it, it would be “de-emphasizing part of the State’s case.” ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643558 - 2023-04-11
the evidence is,” and if the court omitted it, it would be “de-emphasizing part of the State’s case.” ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643558 - 2023-04-11
[PDF]
WI APP 235
standards is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26898 - 2014-09-15
standards is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26898 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Scot A. Czarnecki
reviews de novo. See State v. Mendoza, 227 Wis.2d 838, 849, 596 N.W.2d 736, 742 (1999). We follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14408 - 2014-09-15
reviews de novo. See State v. Mendoza, 227 Wis.2d 838, 849, 596 N.W.2d 736, 742 (1999). We follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14408 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, we must interpret and apply statutes to undisputed facts, a question of law for our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31090 - 2014-09-15
, we must interpret and apply statutes to undisputed facts, a question of law for our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31090 - 2014-09-15
09AP1091 Parkland Plaza Veterinary Clinic v. Anne Gerard
preventing plaintiff from ever again filing pro se suits); De Long [v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144, 1148 (9th
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44371 - 2009-12-10
preventing plaintiff from ever again filing pro se suits); De Long [v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144, 1148 (9th
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44371 - 2009-12-10
2011 WI APP 33
judgment de novo using the same standard and methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59802 - 2011-03-29
judgment de novo using the same standard and methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59802 - 2011-03-29
CA Blank Order
de novo. See id., 2008 WI App 166, ¶9, 314 Wis. 2d at 668, 762 N.W.2d at 388–389. Having reviewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117632 - 2014-07-16
de novo. See id., 2008 WI App 166, ¶9, 314 Wis. 2d at 668, 762 N.W.2d at 388–389. Having reviewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117632 - 2014-07-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
clearly erroneous, we uphold the circuit court’s findings of fact, and we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247408 - 2019-12-12
clearly erroneous, we uphold the circuit court’s findings of fact, and we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247408 - 2019-12-12
[PDF]
WI APP 76
The constitutionality of a statute presents a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Stevenson, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149248 - 2017-09-21
The constitutionality of a statute presents a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Stevenson, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149248 - 2017-09-21