Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 29958 for de.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 29958 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to undisputed facts presents a question of law we review de novo. Hempel v. City of Baraboo, 2005 WI 120, ¶21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149225 - 2017-09-21
to undisputed facts presents a question of law we review de novo. Hempel v. City of Baraboo, 2005 WI 120, ¶21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149225 - 2017-09-21
County of Waukesha v. Laura J. M.
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19177 - 2005-08-02
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19177 - 2005-08-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(2) (2017-18). We review a circuit court’s decision on summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264668 - 2020-06-16
(2) (2017-18). We review a circuit court’s decision on summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264668 - 2020-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44484 - 2009-12-09
assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44484 - 2009-12-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
and de novo review”). ¶6 As a preliminary matter, Terry and the Commission disagree on what level
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41530 - 2014-09-15
and de novo review”). ¶6 As a preliminary matter, Terry and the Commission disagree on what level
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41530 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 23
review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Munger v. Seehafer, 2016 WI App 89, ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775494 - 2024-05-08
review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Munger v. Seehafer, 2016 WI App 89, ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775494 - 2024-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
) (discussing the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41530 - 2009-09-28
) (discussing the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41530 - 2009-09-28
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Sommer
factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8157 - 2017-09-19
factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8157 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64172 - 2011-05-17
an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64172 - 2011-05-17
COURT OF APPEALS
a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same familiar methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78237 - 2012-02-21
a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same familiar methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78237 - 2012-02-21