Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 29810 for des.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 29810 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Avery T., Jr.
or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8594 - 2017-09-19
or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8594 - 2017-09-19
County of Fond du Lac v. Vincent W. English
and review de novo whether such facts satisfy constitutional guarantees. See State v. Harwood, 2003 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18696 - 2005-06-28
and review de novo whether such facts satisfy constitutional guarantees. See State v. Harwood, 2003 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18696 - 2005-06-28
State v. Marcus A. Farina
reviews de novo. See Coston v. Joseph P., 222 Wis. 2d 1, 10, 586 N.W.2d 52 (Ct. App. 1998). Application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2422 - 2013-11-04
reviews de novo. See Coston v. Joseph P., 222 Wis. 2d 1, 10, 586 N.W.2d 52 (Ct. App. 1998). Application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2422 - 2013-11-04
Catherine A. Dellabella v. Dellabella Motors, Inc.
orders. ¶2 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25192 - 2006-05-17
orders. ¶2 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25192 - 2006-05-17
[PDF]
Frank D. Hurst Corporation v. Tamara A. Johnson
. LIRC, 192 Wis.2d 663, 670, 531 N.W.2d 451, 454 (Ct. App. 1995). As such, we review it de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10530 - 2017-09-20
. LIRC, 192 Wis.2d 663, 670, 531 N.W.2d 451, 454 (Ct. App. 1995). As such, we review it de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10530 - 2017-09-20
State v. Jose R.
legal conclusions are reviewed de novo. Id., ¶16. Here, Jose R. does not contend that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
legal conclusions are reviewed de novo. Id., ¶16. Here, Jose R. does not contend that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45733 - 2010-01-13
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45733 - 2010-01-13
Amerequip Corporation -- New Holstein v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
presents a question of law which this court may review de novo. We disagree. Even when the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14715 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law which this court may review de novo. We disagree. Even when the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14715 - 2005-03-31
State v. Albin E. Bartosz
the definition of a "pier" under § 30.01(5), Stats. This court reviews a summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8294 - 2005-03-31
the definition of a "pier" under § 30.01(5), Stats. This court reviews a summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8294 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Sommer
factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8157 - 2017-09-19
factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8157 - 2017-09-19