Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 29810 for des.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 29810 for des.
State v. Albin E. Bartosz
the definition of a "pier" under § 30.01(5), Stats. This court reviews a summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8294 - 2005-03-31
the definition of a "pier" under § 30.01(5), Stats. This court reviews a summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8294 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Sommer
factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8157 - 2017-09-19
factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8157 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
and de novo review”). ¶6 As a preliminary matter, Terry and the Commission disagree on what level
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41530 - 2014-09-15
and de novo review”). ¶6 As a preliminary matter, Terry and the Commission disagree on what level
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41530 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Borowski requested de novo review and the trial court conducted evidentiary hearings on February 28
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108053 - 2017-09-21
. Borowski requested de novo review and the trial court conducted evidentiary hearings on February 28
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108053 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is admissible under a hearsay exception is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Joyner, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186149 - 2017-09-21
is admissible under a hearsay exception is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Joyner, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186149 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Fond du Lac v. Kathleen M. Flood
, Flood’s contention that we are dealing with a question of law which we review de novo is simply wrong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3289 - 2017-09-19
, Flood’s contention that we are dealing with a question of law which we review de novo is simply wrong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3289 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
settlements plus taxable costs. Chartis appeals. ¶5 Our standard of review is de novo because we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108751 - 2017-09-21
settlements plus taxable costs. Chartis appeals. ¶5 Our standard of review is de novo because we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108751 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David A. Morris
an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2329 - 2017-09-19
an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2329 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
review of the sufficiency of the postconviction motion is de novo. Id., ¶9. Because Ehrett’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129364 - 2014-11-19
review of the sufficiency of the postconviction motion is de novo. Id., ¶9. Because Ehrett’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129364 - 2014-11-19
State v. Todd R. Martin
its burden of establishing a prima facie case is a question of law that we decide de novo. Id. at 78
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20895 - 2006-01-10
its burden of establishing a prima facie case is a question of law that we decide de novo. Id. at 78
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20895 - 2006-01-10