Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
Brown County v. April O.
hearing within the mandatory time limits. WISCONSIN STAT. § 48.315(2) allows the court to extend those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3419 - 2017-09-19
hearing within the mandatory time limits. WISCONSIN STAT. § 48.315(2) allows the court to extend those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3419 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Brown County v. April O.
hearing within the mandatory time limits. WISCONSIN STAT. § 48.315(2) allows the court to extend those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3418 - 2017-09-19
hearing within the mandatory time limits. WISCONSIN STAT. § 48.315(2) allows the court to extend those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3418 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ extended supervision. That sentence consisted of thirty-five years’ initial confinement and twenty years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476745 - 2022-01-25
’ extended supervision. That sentence consisted of thirty-five years’ initial confinement and twenty years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476745 - 2022-01-25
[PDF]
State v. Gerald Seay
.2d 95 (Ct. App. 1996). Neither Drake nor Tobey precludes a RULE 809.82 motion to extend the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13899 - 2014-09-15
.2d 95 (Ct. App. 1996). Neither Drake nor Tobey precludes a RULE 809.82 motion to extend the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13899 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
and seven years’ extended supervision on the armed robbery charge; four years’ initial confinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57149 - 2014-09-15
and seven years’ extended supervision on the armed robbery charge; four years’ initial confinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57149 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to consecutive terms of three years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545910 - 2022-07-20
to consecutive terms of three years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545910 - 2022-07-20
COURT OF APPEALS
The court found no causal connection between John’s meeting with Wilson and the bank’s refusal to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84547 - 2012-07-10
The court found no causal connection between John’s meeting with Wilson and the bank’s refusal to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84547 - 2012-07-10
COURT OF APPEALS
months’ extended supervision (ES). The State also would be free to argue the ES conditions. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35337 - 2009-01-27
months’ extended supervision (ES). The State also would be free to argue the ES conditions. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35337 - 2009-01-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
sixteen months’ initial confinement and fourteen months’ extended supervision (ES). The State also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35337 - 2014-09-15
sixteen months’ initial confinement and fourteen months’ extended supervision (ES). The State also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35337 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and to recommend four to eight years of initial confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208481 - 2018-02-13
, and to recommend four to eight years of initial confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208481 - 2018-02-13